mochi_tsuki ([info]mochi_tsuki) wrote,

What's the point of a makeover...

... if you don't get to keep the clothes?

The one thing I really like about Sarah Palin is her wardrobe. As a big-busted woman myself, I know how hard it is to find good-looking professional clothes that fit properly. Lots of things work well when you stand in front of a mirror, but bunch and grab awkwardly as soon as you move your arms. Or you're stuck with shapeless smocks. I've been admiring Palin's clothes (if nothing else about her). Granted, they no doubt cost much more than I'm willing to spend, but if designers can make high-end clothes for that body shape, maybe the rest of the fashion industry can figure out how to make them for the rest of us.

As annoyed as I was with the media's obsession with Hillary's pantsuits, I've been equally annoyed that they haven't paid as much attention to Palin's look. Not because I think it reflects on her, but because it would be a service to all hour-glass women.

  • Post a new comment

    Error

  • 4 comments

[info]ahistoricality

October 22 2008, 16:55:12 UTC 3 years ago

I've always felt that the attention to how much people in public life spend on clothes and makeup was a bit absurd: they have to look good, professional, alert; it's very easy to look bad, sloppy and droopy even when you're really being professional and alert. They have the resources to afford high quality products and services that enhance their constituents' confidence in their abilities: more power to 'em, I say.

I do, however, have some qualms about the use of political campaign money, and the hypocrisy of the RNC dumping that much high-fashion money on the family when they made such a big deal out of much more moderate and appropriate spending by Democrats.....

[info]mochi_tsuki

October 22 2008, 23:10:45 UTC 3 years ago

Not only absurd, but absurdly biased. A huge kerfuffle over John Edwards' haircut, miles of print on Hillary's pantsuits, and barely a blip on McCain's $1000 make-up session. Yes, they all spend money on appearance. It's part of the job description. Either cover it all equally or don't cover it at all.

What's ironic, to me anyway, about the RNC investment is who it was targeted at. That kind of fashion is an inside-the-beltway, big-wigs and donors look. They were grooming her to appeal to their own sensibilities, not those of voters.

[info]anelith

October 22 2008, 17:11:24 UTC 3 years ago

Wow, my eyes popped out at the dollar amounts on those clothes. And the campaign even spent money at a couple of high-priced baby stores. That's rather shameless. Why am I so surprised?

But you're right, Palin does look very good in those clothes, and it would be nice if there were more decently priced clothes out there for all body shapes -- big *and* small chested. I'm flat as a board and can't find a thing to wear that doesn't sag.

[info]mochi_tsuki

October 22 2008, 23:27:24 UTC 3 years ago

I'm waiting for the store that sizes clothes by shape. What is a size 10? or 12 or any other number? Give me tops measured by bust size and arm length. Pants by waist, hips and length. Lane Bryant is moving that direction in their pants, but I've never seen it anywhere else.
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…